Thursday, April 20, 2017

MauriceCliffordWorld

Maurice Clifford World: Force of Entanglement,
a phenomenological fragment





I am under the spell of an image. It is the vision that demands
that I say everything the vision gives to me.
    Pierre Klossowski

breathe

MauriceCliffordWorld: primal prometheus attempting to spring out of and simultaneously burrow into the flatness of everyday life, trying to be free of the weak messianic (technical) force of everyday life -- and its ill-prepared drum and bugle corp/se --both internal life and external life, attempting to wrench free into some sort of Hegelian Absolute Knowledge where everything falls away in the obsessive search for IT, down the tubular and out and then flooding back into the tulpa, er, I mean the Tube, a conspiracy, THE Conspiracy, all connected with everything, maximum leveraged payout, a pagan world of multiplicities, back doors, only to break out upon the labyrinthine, obsidian black mirror, granitic emergence of the monumentality of the Law (what is THAT?! It must be conspired continuously to us apes, we who are always determined to spread feces on the granite corridors) the constant breathing together of the Law, yet constantly shifting, undermining hyper-monadologies, connecting all the way up and all the way down, escape proof, seamless, forming its own bedrock reality, gods flaming on dead, the secret life of rust revealed over and over, the corruption of every sort of body yet forms continue to bleed through the massiveness of the Law, fabulous, phantasmal and continual sproutings, incredible verdancy escapes through the mysterious cracks of the laws of form, a ginned up profusion, haunted by the artistic and mystic: mystical because speechless, breathless, vertiginous assaults, artistic because freedom and the soul of the uncanny nest in each other, Russian Dolls at the still center of Maurice Clifford World (MCW), debris launching upon and breaking against that MCW Center (always shuttling back and forth, periphery  to center, forces hopelessly entangled, cum smeared dialectic breeding breaking the spiraling force sliding back and forth breathing time and space folding numerous rotten supports blasted apart and jammed back together, the Black Mirror grabbing bits of rot with a tip of the brush, trying to pierce with dead inky paint matter and skin of dinosaur poems, porosity being the secret lie of the canted solidus holding apart the apocalyptic and the prophetic, the one always carrying the other it its temporal wake, through porosity even, meanwhile waiting for the breakout, the final entanglement of all loose Ends, MCW entertains eldritch unthinkables, where SOMEbody must know SOMEthing, concerning the Last Days of the empire of rust, even mounded up into a fake, fairy Institution of Rust death dirt debris, conspiring beyond the Edge, beyond the Pale, signal propagating through the soil of WHERE WE ARE NOW!! Even you! no matter where who when living dead, Spukhafte Fernwirkungen spooky signal entanglement  no matter you are in the continuum of to come, has been, still here: yes, we are all becoming MCW now, the breach of the old sublime by the uncanny, arriving from underneath, sub-Euclidean chthonic forcefield beneath of irreducible haecceity, the unique ‘thisness’ on the verge of being subsumed by the neuter of generic rust of death, the explosion of the flat frame: how to capture on flaming canvas the exploding pustules and yet...there is always some other, subaltern, some other position--let’s call it Egyptian--that hides in full sight from MCW, a conspiracy that is always, fruitlessly, to suture the prophetic and the apocalyptic, energy centers that never fully reveal themselves but must be launched against endlessly, on voyages of dark matter and dark energy, sorceric incantations wrenched to frame, both for and against the fog of rust and particulate matter urging production of delirium, ecstatic masses leaping dangerously from rift to rift, from death to death, attempting to stave off any universal disaster:  “The end of the world haunting this ‘prophet’ of the absence of the other, the catastrophe of the Last Judgement in whose abyss he disappears, comes to a halt before ‘the name of that which has no ‘name’ [....] no nothing, no thinking about nothing, concerning nothingness can be allowed to punch a hole in the corpus of his identity. He is at the last frontier--the putrescent--before total decomposition, and he can allow himself no rest and no absence, for there is nothing other than this proliferation.”  Michel Certeau, on The Institution of Rot

Breathe

MCW, painter of uncanny proliferation, blood sacrifices (all breathing together now, all guilty) energy torrents released whether Mayan pyramids or hyper capital collapse of 9/11 or ‘only’ the ongoing collapse of the modern sublime empty, emitting or receiving furls and coils of energy blackening the canvas surface with fugitive figures mired in chthonic misery and mystery, instead of pyramids now mystery cosmic linkage of appliances and being (“Built of rust and dinosaurs’ oil, the appliance has a ‘state of emergency built into it, its failure mode [default position, redundancy] necessary for its operation. Every manu/fractured object is an explosive device that has already been exploded--and is now, as modernity--shrapnel in mid-slo-mo flight. The hand always a trigger, the target nowhere in sight.” small appliances, Fehta Murghana)
MCW realizes and seeks to make manifest this powerful techno-mantic, even messianic, phrase: ‘Collective Synchronization can act like a phase transition’ wherein, behold! ‘Something New Emerges (is that ever the case now? Wouldn’t all breathing stop, final fulfillment?) In MCW the new always arrives besotted, clogged in clouds of debris, lust, rust, dust, particulate matter of ever increasing density, blotting out light, even as the canvas cuts away to reveal galactic planes of compaction and fragmentation of brush’s whisk, dip and twirl, inhuman force tangled with all-too-human.

breathe

Tuesday, April 11, 2017

the nose knows: SLIP AGE

 SLIP AGE
 
Robert R. Cheatham


"During swallowing we do not breathe into the lungs; but if, at this moment, one closes one's nostrils, the auditory perception of external sounds is altered. Thus Understanding is opened up. [Trans.: in French the word for understanding -- entendement -- shares the same root as entendre, to hear or to understand.] This is not mere supposition but the secret of the occult effect of pronouncing certain words. The reason is that the Eustachian tube, which provides air to the eardrum (middle ear) is usually closed and opens only at each swallowing movement . . . .
However, for swallowing to take place there must be a liquid medium; the production of saliva is thus of great importance.....


This phenomena of `the calling to the inner ear' may be compared with the gesture of `swallowing one's saliva' in moments of extreme concentration, when one finds oneself hard pressed for an answer.."

R. A. Schwaller de Lubicz
---

If nothing else, this seems to be an age in which "one always finds oneself hard pressed for an answer." Being paranoid (preeminently a situation of being aware of other systems as well as being inhabited by them), it is an age that suspects that `behind the scenes,' intermittent with the swallowing, an opening and closing of events that has become so rapid as to effect a strobing of reality, the effect of which is, much as in the visual effect itself, a stopping of reality, confirming, in fact, multiple and diverse realities confined behind the stoppage of the swallow. And yet: this is NOT a visual effect, not a by-product of rationality, and hence a product of, as it is commonly theorized, modernity and the flat visuality of surfaces, even post modernity as the clutter and bric-a-brac of old and new surfaces jammed together.


We might characterize this other system as rhinological, encompassing all the nosological analyses which can only be pointed to (ala Wittgenstein's famous dictum considering the point of last resort in `explaining' art; certainly odors -- and the alliance with taste -- would go far beyond even art's reliance on antecedent mechanisms of parousia-like structures. And even more problematic than Shakespeare's `un-hinged times' is Hamlet's keen nosological apparatus: `there's something rotten in Denmark', `rot' being an uncanny concatenation of presence -- literally molecules of a `foreign substance' -- in the nasal mucosa, combined with the becoming-visible of depth-in-surface, an interstitial mechanism that finally announces itself--after it is too late--as the Last Coming before complete dissolution back into the mineral kingdom. The nomination of this rot by institutions as rot is always a more-than-negentropic attempt at constraint of this other system of total Otherness -- one based perhaps more on Novalis' conception of the obdurate mineral nature of a heavy metal deity, a place where there would be NO line of sight, having collapsed into itself, absolute presencing rather than absolute absencing -- as de Certeau maintains as the "game of the institution. It lodges rottenness at the same time as it designates it. It assigns it a place, but a circumscribed one, constituted as an internal secret: between us, you're nothing but a slut, you're only a subject who is supposed to know. By lodging this `rottenness' within itself, the institution takes charge of it, limiting it to a truth that is known and pronounced on the inside, while allowing another discourse on the outside, the noble discourse of its theoretical manifestation."
1 This `institution of rot' has defined a whole arena of abject art [one is tempted to just say: modern art], all defined by a certain performativity --whether performance art or no -- of this osmotic slippage, and all generated by these interstitial mechanisms of modernity. But. Even so: the smell remains, of both decay and flowers. And as the twentieth century well knows, they are most often mingled, and nowhere least than at the peaks/glan[d]s of eroticism.)

And yet elided in this oscillation by a slippage not aligned with vision and hearing is, more disturbingly, the olfactory. Yes, tympanum etc. having been given a hearing, woven back into the flexed chiasmus of the optic and -- even if it has its skiatropic aspect, photographing even the shadows, even the x-rays -- the x always reveiling/revealing/refilling the chiasmatic relationship of shadow and substance. A whole system, almost Hegelian in its defiances and subsumptions. 2 However, the nose knows no fort/da, the reptilian hindbrain not being known for any dialectic, no matter how sublimated. The "calling to the inner ear" and the "swallowing of one's saliva" may pass each other but that hardly makes for a dialectic.


But...there are moments when one catches a whiff of something else. Webster's last definition of smell is "that which suggests the presence or existence of something; a trace; a suggestion." The sense of smell is a literal mechanism: bits of the substance, molecules, float free of the main body of the substance and enter the nose where the molecule fits into slot which only it can fit into.
Slippage is a moment of particularity, granularity even in the visual system of modernity (in the moist nether regions of modernity, slippage turns into something quite else). A thing of the eye, where causalities can be readily determined, where faultlines, and `whences' and `heretofores' can be properly adjudicated into their positions on various scales of judgment and the propré , vision subjugating all other senses -- and hence cognitions -- to its realm of the planar, a continual high noon of thought...as even now we follow these trudging marks across the expanse of white, its desert blooming inside us. The very nature of the incisions at fundamental odds with the parousia which the nose offers, the bits and pieces of otherness becoming-stuck in the wet cavernous darkness--anathema to us moderns and the reign of the ubiquitous, odorless, granular-not-glandular Machine. (whatever recognition of those swamp lands makes its way from Plato's cave to Nietzsche's veils and the mysteries/esotericisms of Wo/man being firmly tamped-down with gender/queer studies. More machine-work and desert-reclamation projects: who would--who could??--build in the swamplands? From Hypocrites in de Lubicz: "Thus the glands, profiting from the superabundant hunger of the rest of the body, find a suitable nourishment. And, therefore, where there are swampy parts of the body, there are found the glands; and proof of this is that where there are glands there also are hairs. Nature produces glands and hairs. Glands and hairs are equally useful: glands for the affaent humor, as has been said; hairs, having precisely what the glands furnish them, spring up and grow, gathering the superfluity which seethes toward the extremities. But there, where the body is dry, there are neither glands nor hairs."
3 )

But was it slippage when Freud and Fliess collaborated on Fliess's nasal reflex neurosis theory?4 The early Freud's discourses around modes of unmediated presence -- telepathy, the seduction theory, and Fliess's' nasal reflex neurosis -- certainly suffered slippage when it became Jung's turn to offer the glove to be smelled, causing considerable confusion over what was a new age, what was an old age, and what was simply a `rising tide' of black gunk smelling up the place. We are still in slippage --no doubt a form of denial, and to reverse the old joke and to agree with de Lubicz, perhaps it is a place (or at least a "system" in Egypt
5 ).

Modernity's confused attempts to extirpate smell, to deny rot, has only meant that: (1) its gestation period for the mycorhizal mass6 has been increased -- and facilitated -- by the machinic and (2) the `noble discourse' of rot is beginning to slough off the human in favor of the Novalisian granitic immediacy and simultaneity of the uncanny inhuman of the technical media and the global kybernetes, `dead helmsman'.


One could indeed come to grief from one's own body, especially as it comes to be inhabited by the new electronic mycorrhizal mass. We may yet all turn out to be Schreber's children.


footnotes


1. Michel de Certeau, "The Institution of Rot" in Psychosis and Sexual Identity: Toward a Post-Analytic View of the Schreber Case (Albany: SUNY,1988), p. 98.

2. The dangers of `theorizing' any such anti-body `system-within-a-system' are well know by now, the Zen-like exhaustion which they bring about well explored . see Paul Mann, The Theory-Death of the Avant-Garde (Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1991).
Derrida has enacted this trepidation/impassibility/re-colonization in regard to alien systems thusly:
"The concept of Chinese writing thus functioned as a sort of European hallucination. This implied nothing fortuitous: this functioning obeyed a rigorous necessity. And the hallucination translated less an ignorance than a misunderstanding. It was not disturbed by the knowledge of Chinese script, limited but real, which was then available.


At the same time as the 'Chinese prejudice,' a 'hieroglyphist prejudice' had produced the same effect of interested blindness. The occultation, far from proceeding, as it would seem, from ethnocentric scorn, takes the form of an hyperbolical admiration. We have not finished verifying the necessity of this pattern. Our century is not free from it; each time that ethnocentrism is precipitately and ostentatiously reversed, some effort silently hides behind all the spectacular effects to consolidate an inside and to draw from it some domestic benefit. The astonishing Father Kircher thus devoted his entire genius to opening the West to Egyptology, but the very excellence that he recognized in a 'sublime' script forbade any scientific deciphering of it."
Jacques Derrida (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1976) Of Grammatology, p 80.


This, of course, solves no problems but merely aporetically restates them. The systems of the eye can thus be endlessly stated and re-stated, all within the terrain of vision and geometry (reaching the mystical null-set of its apotheosis in mathematics and the quantum universe), western culture depends on it; but how would one even be able to start to formulate the system of the nose within the borders of the rhinological?

3. R.A. Schwaller de Lubicz, The Temple In Man: Sacred Architecture and the Perfect Man (Rochester: Inner, 1977). p. 97.

4. "The question of the source of the states of stimulation in the nasal organs now arises. The idea suggests itself that the qualitative organ for olfactory stimuli may be Schneider's membrane and the quantitative organ (distinct from this) may be the corpora cavernosa. Olfactory substances -- as indeed, you yourself believe, and as we know from flowers -- are breakdown products of the sexual metabolism; they would act as stimuli on both these organs. During menstruation and other sexual processes the body produces an increased Q of these substances and therefore of these stimuli. It would have to be decided whether these act on the nasal organs through the expiratory air or through the blood vessels; probably the latter, since one has no subjective sensation of smell before migraine. Thus the nose would, as it were, receive information about internal olfactory stimuli by means of the corpora cavernosa, just as it does about external stimuli by Schneider's membrane: one would come to grief from one's own body." letter from Sigmund Freud to Wilhelm Fliess, January 1, 1896. In Jeffrey Masson, ed., The Complete Letters of Sigmund Freud to Wilhelm Fliess, 1887-1904 (Cambridge: Harvard, 1985) p. 161.

5. The Kantian postulates of the modern encapsulation, versus de Lubicz's `moist,' nasal Egyptians, are stated thusly by Joel Whitebook :
"The Egyptians discovered certain geometric laws empirically and pragmatically [....] It is argued, however, that the validity of those geometric laws has nothing to do with their pragmatic usefulness; validity can only be established by completely independent procedures, namely, the proofs of Euclid. The Kantian insistenceon a strict separation between genesis and validity is born out of the fear that the introduction of genetic questions (histroricism, sociologicism, psychologicism, anthropologicism, economicism, and so on) into the consideration of a theory's validity would have two undesirable consequences. First, it could jeopardize the validity of that particular theory -- that is, the theory could not be maintained to be valid unconditionally, independent of the contingent conditions that produced it. Second, it could threaten the very notion of validity." Joel Whitebook Perversion and Utopia: A Study in Psychoanalysis and Critical Theory (Cambridge: MIT, 1995) p. 223.


For another very interesting approach to an alternate -- literally genetic -- communication system which would, disconcertingly close to a Spinozist Immanent Substance, undercut many `validities', see Jeremy Narby, The Cosmic Serpent: DNA and the Origins of Knowledge (New York: Tarcher, 1998). Here, the visual itself seems to become rhinological in its communion of `presence' (cell-to-cell phototic communication by DNA). `Hallucinatory' knowledge always hangs under a scientific dark cloud; such `knowing' alway appears to be `rotten' from the moment that science takes its first `whiff', even though, paradoxically, such `rotten knowledge', whether Egyptian, chemical, or some other phantasmagorical agency--including the fictive `self'--, unites `genesis' and `validity.'


In fact, the presence of something like Spinoza's monstrous Substance within many alternate discourses, from contemporary horror and science fiction movies (all the way from all the remakes of Invasion of the Body Snatchers to more recently The Faculty) to Deleuze and Guattari is fascinating. The nose would appear to be the leading edge in discovering this triangulated (and according to popular media culture, monstrous) `generality' folded under our surface Attributes, ready to take over the specificities of subjectivity and institute its own smelly collective subterranean mass. The olfactory --and its symbologies--is at the very heart of a sacramental sharing of Substance, since its mechanism of `communication' is accomplished through morcellating some other.

6. While `rot' and `fungus' are not exactly co-terminous, it is hard to conceive of one without the other. We can allude to this other subterranean system at the moment, even if it has given rise to a whole theoretical approach, the Deleuzian rhizome. Preeminently a mycological phenomena, it's connection with what one might call the sorceric literature is voluminous and is the very definition of a skiatropic organism one might say. It also forms a system which, though perhaps not the antithesis of modernity, is certainly its antipode. As a further aside within an aside, etymologically speaking, -mycetes refers generally to a large group of fungi; Mycetes means `to bellow'. For now, I will leave it to the reader to further connect the dots between Daniel Paul Schreber, bellowing, mushrooms, technology, secret mycorhisal masses, rot, and ancient egyptian systems of particularized calculus. The processes of verification and validation which science brings to bear to `reality' rests on the necessity for a continual `state of emergency' derived from this Kantian-like split between genesis and validation, fiction and fact, self and other, the phantasmic and the real, the rotten and the solid; in other words, a reliance on a certain performativity which constantly re-enacts this split thereby certifying the `fact' of the world. There are places of leakage and rot however all thoughout the culture, a mycellium of `communicating vessels': "...it is as if the taint of tautological nonsense, the performative force that pertains, at some level, to all institutions and the social facts they sponsor, has begun to leak beyond all `normally' circumscribed space and to dissolve the intitution's capacity to provide a credible context of meaningful reality. At such moments we are at the threshold of a psychotic universe where the subject has become unable to forget, unable (primordially) to repress, the drive dimension of symbolic function, which expands into a general state of rotteness and decay."
Eric L. Santer, My Own Private Germany: Daniel Paul Schreber's Secret History of Modernity (Princeton: Princeton, 1996) p.43.

Falling, Apart :Being, blown, apart

							(Apparatus  :  footnotes) 

Keeping Up With BEING, Blown, Apart
footnotes to an absent text

Fehta Murghana (collated by r.cheat'm )

...so that...the great age of spatiality/motion/collapse arrives as one side of a flexion, hinge, or joint, still leaving open notions of temporality, and the question: how many hinges are there? (And not only that but how secure is the joint/hinge? Apocalypsis, its very possibility, rests on the insecurity of time's hinge, that the door is not only permanently ajar but that the possibility of fully closing or opening it is impeded: that impedance is the unHistoricity/hysteresisity that always leaves open the desire for a final closing/opening. (For an unsurpassed examination of this `peephole effect' and the phrase `time out of joint' see the opening chapter of The Specter of Marx, J. Derrida.) "1
			regardless of the expectancies involved, like all pregnancies, a
		certain risk is entailed, either during birth, or resulting from 
		consequencies lateral to the `event' (ereignis) ; said danger 
		languishing (at least previously to `now', and keeping in mind
        Heidegger's admonition that as the danger grows so too the `saving' 
        power) in the contextual apparatus...2
		
		...and here a suspicion could be raised concerning pronouncements
		of the `end of the author' and under what cultural auspices such a 
		statement could have been made.3
		...such concerns subtend issue of the `technological Singularity'
		and its futural, teleological `pull' as opposed to some originating 
		ur-event: the Big Suck as opposed to the Big Bang. 4
...when even the most abject nihilists turn in their foxhole... 5 ...under such circumstances, even the most recursive genealogical 6 structures (which apocalypsis must rely on: the closed human community, closed from `progress', from nature, from evolution: the fly in the fly bottle but: inhabited by ghosts [geist]) tend to `flatten out' in the more fine-grained temporal circumstances of a constant `now', losing `cosmic' qualities in favor of static (noise and stasis), although either tragic or comic, personal qualities; in such a culture (as ours) apocalypse establishes distance as well as eradicates it--the new fractal, recursive, inflationary, uncanny universe would point to diversifying genealogical structures through technological intervention: the monstrous uncanny and the collapse of the traditional genealogical. All apocalypses seem to share at least the notion of boundary collapse.
Adorno speaking of progress, decadence, and the Jugendstil artists:
"In the urgent desire to eternalize their state in images lived this sentiment (and here they agreed deeply with the philosophers of life): whatever it was about themselves which seemed to prophecy both their own and the world's downfall, in this alone is the true rescued. Hardly anyone has expressed this more succintly than Peter Altenberg: `Mistreatment of horses. This will cease when passers-by will be so irritable and decadent that they become raving mad in such cases and, losing control of themselves, commit a desperate crime, shooting down the vile, cowardly coachman--. Inability to tolerate mistreatment of horses is the deed of the decadent, weak-nerved human being of the future! So far, human beings have just had the miserable strength to steer clear of such troubling affairs and mind their own business.' Just so, Nietzsche, who condemned pity, collapsed in Turin when he saw how a coachman beat his horse. Decadence was the fata morgana of the progress which had not yet begun." (Progress, T. W. Adorno, in Benjamin: Philosophy, Aesthetics, History, ed. Gary Smith) 7
Considerations of collapse, catastrophe, and disaster have always been a part of a culture's baseline of operations, usually in conjunction with `defense' postures, broadly conceived. (Manuel de Landa's work shows how `military logistics' has played a pivotal role in civilizational development, strategizing based on maximization of resources/technical development with the aim of forestalling collapse. This `aim' is not a teleological concept but a `line of flight' which seems to inhere in the relationship between materiality and consciousness, what de Landa calls the `machinic phylum'. Such an approach raises rather severe questions about the possiblity of technical advancement outside the confines of aggressivity, especially since it always seems manifested in a military, or even quasi-military--e.g., corporate--environment. The idea of apocalypse would then be, sui generis, inherent in the structure of technical innovation in that it forms one of the boundary conditions under which technology develops. See War In the Age of Intelligent Machines, de Landa.) Even the earliest cultures have elaborate mythologies delineating boundary conditions wherein one side denotes identity and the other dissolution. The ancient Egyptians believed that ma'at, the principle of balance and justice, was continually in conflict with superhuman powers of chaos and conflict called isfet and that nations and individuals could be in league with this principle. The leader of these embodiments of isfet - also translated as `falsehood' or `injustice' - was the gigantic, dragon-like serpent called Apophis or Apep: `Apophis was an embodiment of primordial chaos. He had no sense-organs, he could neither hear nor see, he could only scream. And he operated always in darkness. ` (N. Cohn, Cosmos, Chaos and the World to Come: The Ancient Roots of Apocalyptic Faith.) 8
...and what delineation of `facts', what statistical enumeration of data, what demographic survey, what characteristics, what laboratory experiment could possibly reveal the truth of `unveiling' (given that the crowbar doing the unveiling would also have to be unveiled)? What arena could possibly give enough distance from the goalline and still be `in the ballpark'? What being could get far enough from being to see being whole, the beginning and the end? A being which is non-being, an inhuman being, an exploded being, a being for whom the apocalypse has already occurred--but then, how could you trust/understand (even perceive) such a dispersed (non) being (something spectral but not a ghost, not some'thing' which `left and came back' but something which rounded the corner and is signaling through the trees)? 9
		...perhaps the disaster has already happened; perhaps it is
happening
		daily, a void incrementally opening with every flip of a switch, every 
		shiver of an electron.  It's hard for the Law to catch up with an 
		Oldsmobile.  (Perhaps it's nothing new though: `In the Islamic sense 
		of time we are always in the last days.'  The Apocalypse of Islam 
		in Apocalypse and/or Metamorphosis, Norman O. Brown)
10,11
It should not be surprising that fire has always functioned as the final trope of the apocalyptic series beginning with water and flood: a theological `ontology recapitulating the elemental,' a gravid amniotic gathering and then incandescent dispersal. And of course water and fire function as the very stuff and substance of the coils of the dialectic...and the crucible of biology. What, if anything then, beyond fire? Smoke? Ashes? 12, 13
		"...in naming the mental being of man communicates itself to
		God.
		"Naming, in the realm of language, has as its sole purpose and 
		its incomparably high meaning that it is the innermost nature of language

		itself.  Naming is that by which nothing beyond it is communicated, and 
		in which language itself communicates itself absolutely." [...]  
		"The deepest images of this divine word and the point where human 
		language participates most intimately in the divine infinity of the pure
		word, the point at which it cannot become finite word and knowledge, are 
		the human name.  The theory of proper names is the theory of the frontier
                between finite and infinite language."
		Walter Benjamin, On Language as Such and on the the Language of Man,
		in Reflections, pp.319, 324 14
		Like some viral soup eating away its container ("Language is avirus." 
		Wm. Burroughs) naming eating away at the world, the farthest throw of the
		technical: name it and it will come. and through the wall if need be: agent 
		of collapsing into and out of.
"Who ARE you?" "He never gave me a name."
So spoke Frankenstein's creation upon Victor's death, when queried by the sea captain, frozen in ice, heading north, always north. But then the captain, whose ship is locked in place in the ice, asks of the (technologized human) monster (frozen in its own apterous interior), as the ice is breaking free, "Come with us...". Like all good monsters, especially those who have no name, no genealogy (and they never have names, families--after all that's why they're monsters) he replies, as he turns to immolate his dead `father', "I am done with man'. The captain decides to return home after all, the structure of adventure having collapsed in the face of that which, un-Homerically, can never have a home (and thus presumably only have `adventures'). The unheimlich has become unhinged (if nothing else--yet--in the power of its representations. Technology now prefigures its own release through special effects.) 15
"Cyclones are atmospheric machines that transform latent energy into angular momentum in a feed-back process of potentially catastrophic consequence. Their conditions of emergence are a warm water surface, a latitude of at least five or six degrees deviation from the equator (such that the Coriolis effect is operative), a pronounced instability in the air column or a low surface pressure, and the absence or virtual absence of wind shear. When these conditions coexist a cyclone can develop, over a period that normally lasts from four to eight days. A large cyclone transfers 3.5 billion tons of air an hour from the lower to the upper atmosphere, and releases energy in th order of 1025 ergs every second. At the center of the cyclone is a still zone of low pressure known as the `eye' or `core' which registers no radar echo, and which functions as the immobile motor of the storm's angular momentum or expressed energy. [...] ..an annihilation such as that of the cyclone--in which all stability is washed away and loss alone prevails--is not merely a disaster, but religion" (The Thirst For Annihilation, Nick Land)
...like some monstrous cyclonic force, lines of agitation, brute force, destruction, crackling lines of lightning forking through turbulence, constrained by some force not endemic to its own construction but finally, and awesomely: nothing but a thin shell swirling around an empty center. And it moves of course, the center moves, thereby it seems, um, `alive' or at least some sort of rudimentary will seems to be present; but a strange volition, one based on the crackling energies of the surrounding rotational winds. Yes, that's how it felt sometimes when he got up in the morning, like somehow there had been an emptying during the night, an evisceration of himself through the aegis of surrounding high tension currents/differentia somehow sucking everything out and zapping them, some sort of metaphysical soulbug killer (was he really being emptied or was it just a realization of how empty he was, that there was not, never had been anything at the core--and worse, that the same was true for everyone, that there were nothing but these thin violent crusts interacting? Had Something left--or was it just hiding?) Even the dreams had mostly deserted him, the one signpost he had that he might still be alive at night and not really fully occupied by some monstrous anabatic Other that seemed to be continually pulling him apart into strings of Brownian motion, then taking the particles, shards into the updraft of that thin shell of interactive systems that increasingly seemed to be a "him". He remembered reading about the Great Red Spot on Jupiter and that it might be the result of something called a Taylor Column, a fairly stable pattern that showed all the way through the turbulent layers of atmosphere, and was itself the result of extremely high winds that were somehow `caught' around some surface feature. But maybe, maybe, that was some kind of hope! If we were all Taylor Columns didn't that mean there was some sort of `surface feature' helping to generate it? But such speculation was useless--one could never make it through the turbulent layers to ever find that feature. And to make it worse, the winds seemed to be picking up, the electrical activity increased to a a web of scintillating lines criss-crossing, penetrating the shell, yes, taking on a life of its own almost (But wait a minute! After all it was HIS life wasn't it?--but it seemed to be collapsing into a not-his-life somehow, into the life of that fluttering, crackling crust. Which meant maybe a was-never-his-life. He didn't know whether he was terrified or ecstatic. And maybe there was a very fine line between those two anyway. Like Dorothy being swept from the flat plains of Kansas, surrounded by bits and pieces of her life, swirling by, fire fed by wind, a blowtorch melting experience, words, lives into a fine ash, a crematorium of souls whipped into dark clouds moving at fever pitch toward an ever receding horizon/Emerald City maybe searching for that surface feature to hook onto but everything had become a desert, a flat bleakness scoured into a geometrical precision by millenia of passing vortexes gathering speed as the terrain becomes increasing leveled, speedier, fed by roving skeins of electrical currents. He felt a great mystical fervor overcoming him, the emptying, hollowing only one part (necessary perhaps; inevitable certainly, in the long run--which was actually very short--of mortality, `consciousness') of a great Battery of energies and their flows, circulation patterns becoming visible, absences and presences all forming the same sort of vortextual collapse structure, the old in/out, out/in matey, ego becoming a vacated site and the vacancy of more importance (though `not of the moment' as was the ego--the interactivity skills of the vacancy seeming to belong to another dimensional structure) than its recent occupant. And besides it didn't seem to be completely, truly vacant. The desert of the center seemed to teem with ghostly bedouins, remnants, revenants of previous collapses, though now gaining their/its own form of diaphanous `solidity', possessing a peculiar `granularity,' particulateness through aridity, like all deserts. And like all deserts it no doubt teemed with life, but life of a different order, rhythm, and tension. 16
The contemporary form of collapse is thixotropic: sudden release from the solid into liquidity, flows, unstaunchable cataracts--but only viewed stochastically; otherwise: ooze for each particularity, sometimes not recording well on any chart, meaningful only in the aggregate. The measure of movement by the time of seepage, a delicate deliquescence, the "everything solids melts into thin air " of Marx: leakage then vaporization then condensation then rivulets elsewhere to be further contained in leaky vessels and over again, everything fissured, cracked, porous, all `insides' being summoned to their destination out of their `containers' to the `outside', the osmotic pressure differential of a machine culture, a prosthesized, telematic infosoup of a culture, information, data taking on its own numinous character (but only stochastically, only in the dimension of the real not-real), irreally glowing softly on millions of screens. The dehiscence of everyone's pearly core is a subtle one indeed, only showing its deinostic face in certain phantasmic products of that machine culture, certain visceral visitations of that liquid stochastic entity which, like a puddle of mercury in the palm of the hand, is ever elusive. ( yes, certain images show on the wall of the cave, its most horrid ravenous face turned toward us, but misleading in its ghostly leer--it's not `from' the wall at all: machine gnosis/ghostis--Look out! It's behind you!...always.) An eagre of pinpricks, cascading through wires, luminal and electronic, millions of tiny irrumpent drainage plugs, exosmic, no doubt, into oneiric regions unfathomable by any `sensible' mind. 17
Penetration/viral contamination: A virus has been likened to a microcosmic machine, only nominally alive, more like a nano-compiler, a site for sheer replication, given the right environment. A viral particle consists of `apparatus' for evading a host's defenses while simultaneously colonizing the hosts own cellular machinery and diverting that machinery to more viral replication. A viral particle creates opportunities for its own multiplication while shutting down the host s opportunities for doing so. The reservoirs for viral contamination are the great chaotic animal-liquids of the tropics (rats, insects), furious breeding grounds of organo-liquidity, production of pure escape vectors (epidemiological zones of contagion. There is some evidence that viral bodies follow uncanny paths of infection, unpredictable, springing up and then dying away, with no vector readily observable, the <holding tanks> folding into themselves, disappearing much like they appeared.), Bodies without Organs OR Consciousness, pure vectored machinic assemblage. (<<There is enormous power to the dynamic hierarchy of vectors mobilized by the rats. It combines the insidious subtlety of liquids with the concentrated displacement of compact solids; saturation with jumps. Rats carry fleas which bear diseases, augmenting the fluid dissemination of plagues with a ferociously discontinuous transmission.>> Nick Land in Spirit and Teeth in Of Derrida, Heidegger and Spirit, ed. D. Wood)
From the viewpoint of the intact organism, of the human community, this viral infection is pure collapse, no redeeming virtue.
		"Findings: The affliction is characterized by high temperature 
		around 39 degrees centigrade; frequent vomiting of black, digested 
		blood, but of red blood in a few cases; diarrheal emissions initially 
		sprinkled with blood, with only red blood near death; epistaxis 
		[nosebleeds] now and then; retrosternal and abdominal pain and a state 
		of stupor; prostration with heaviness in the joints; rapid evolution 
		toward death after a period of about three days, from a state of general 
		health." (first description of Ebola fever, the"second most lethal 
		disease of the twentieth century", the first being rabies. from The 
		Coming Plague by L. Garrett).
The breakdown of the human immunological system, in both physical and conceptual systems, is paradigmatic of humanity's crossing into the third millenium. (immuno-deficient responses always a result of deactivated border patrols, deactivated because of a subtle invasion from within.) And viruses have no `communities' but rather `vectors of infection', a ghostly shape of uncertain outlines whose only outpost and sign of presence is a body in decomposition, breached membranes, perforated borders, slow (or fast) leakage starting (staining) a new vector/line of flight. 18
		"Stained souls..."19
		apparatus
		apparition
		[both from L. apparere: to prepare, to attend, to appear]20
void 21 She got up from the little grassy hillock, closed the laptop, pushed the antenna back in, and gazed down the incline. The remains of a road were still visible, dual tracks in the white, sandy soil leading thru young bushy plants here and there, a few tall lanky wildflowers stretching up trying to catch a little sun between the large pines at the edge of the once-road. A few pine seedlings were growing where the ditches would normally be. A few thumb sized ones were growing in the middle of road. As she set off down the slight incline a whip-o-whil cooed mournfully in the distance; they always made him think of those old Hank Williams songs that always seemed to be twanging almost subaudibly in his grandfolks farmhouse, the little radio up in a perch in a corner by the kitchen. A bob white did its bobwhite sound to his right. What was the real name of the damn bird he wondered? Although she had left the tarmac road only about a half mile back, even the occasion car sound had disappeared.
As she got further down in the hollow, clouds of huge dragon flies took off and flitted around confusedly, snapping this way and that for the mosquitos hovering over the small sluggish stream, which she could barely see thru the willowly ferns and tall feathery things. It all had a primeval southern gothic look to it, a setting for some cheap Peter Fonda movie about moonshiners and fast cars. She forded the stream on a few broken planks laying in the water and the corrugated metal of a collapsed culvert. He moved a few feet up the road to an outcropping of rock whic had been exposed in the middle of the road. Do some hell on the undercarriage of a car now, he thought. As she reached it, the partial spoke internally, <<You realize that it will be dark in approximately 2.7 hours.>> Never should have had the damn thing put in. She ignored it, sat down on the rock in the dappled shade, snapped open the notebook and began to type.
<< My father certainly had that sort of worrying obsessiveness. But yes, wory, worry, worry, that s what I do best sometimes I think...sometimes it doesn t even seem to have any content, just vague, persistent forboding. (in high school my friends used to kid me because my father would say--repeatedly of course-- <<if you don't get an education, you re doomed, doomed!>> As it turned out I was doomed anyway. And you know, my father was a teacher--an <<educator>> he liked to say--but I never once saw him read a book. In fact, I don't think he everread a book in his life. At least I never saw him with one...of course I don' t count textbooks...) Well, maybe partly it s sort of a southern <wise blood> disease passed mysteriously thru the generations A sort of Old Testament emotional plague and apocalyptic ferment coming from having to sit in too many tents, with sawdust scattered on the ground, and a coupla naked 60 watt bulbs hanging over a few scattered pews while some farmer/preacher harangues a few other farmers and their scrawny wives and their tow-headed kids, some of them still in their bib overalls, the preacher ranting and raving, but a strange kind of energy coming from poor guy, despite his painful articulations. But mein gott how I despised that!! And hated it more and more the older I got. But you know it was part and parcel of life in the town generally...so I had no choice but to hate everything. But a lot of that came later. When I was a kid it was actually pretty idyllic, riding my bike out to the grandfolks farm, picking blackberries down by the stream. I remember the cows used to keep the side of the hill by the stream, down from the farmhouse so clean, like lawnmowers had gotten to it...>>
He looked up from the glowing screen--hmm, sun HAS gone down quite a bit--and glanced out at where the pasture used to be. nothing but piles of discarded pulpwood, scrub bushes, a lone pine tree here and there under the lengthening shadows
<<...and collecting arrowheads from the hillside next to the farm (Chocta indians used to live at the end of the old dirt road. My grandfather used to catch possums, put them in a 55 gallon barrrel, feed cornmeal to them to `clean'em out'--scavengers you know--and sell them to the indians) while my grandmother made yellow cornbread on the old wood stove when I would arrive on my bicycle. Did all that shit really happen? No way to prove it...unless I go there--and what kind of proof is that, now? None. I could be sitting at home or be at the `farm' typing this and it wouldn t really matter, would it? It just seems entirely too...too quaint maybe. I always used to fantasize about having an observatory on the side of mountain around the farm. Think that was some kind of escapist fantasy? Yeah, maybe...that s also the time I started reading loads of science fiction novels. Hey, sometimes escape is ok, you know? I may have quoted this to you before but I like the quote that goes something like: <<those most intent on preventing escape are the jailers..>> and that just about says it right there. But there was always too much haze and humidity to look at the stars very much. Now New Mexico (or Arizona, or Nevada)...wow, stars like grains of sand, scanzillions scintillating away, seemingly a few feet from yr face...>>
She glanced up to swat a mosquito, simultaneously hearing his partial "Fehta, You have 47 minutes, 18 seconds before sundown. I would advise returning now. You have dinner scheduled with your mother tonight and...."
"Yes, thank you Robbie." If she didn't respond the thing kept blabbing away...besides it was right. She abruptly got up, frightening something in the brush to his left, and headed further up the hill and toward the bend. She was determined to at least LOOK at the old farm, even if she couldn't linger.
Her boots slushed thru the foot tall new-green soft grass as he trudged around the bend, bending limbs from now-overhanging trees out of the way. Grandpa Raylor would certainly have been mortified if he could see the condition the condition of the road he worked on so hard by horse and by hand. A newer gate was set up five years ago to keep out hunters but of course it hadn't done any good. Old beer bottles and cans were scattered around and even on the other side. Stepping around the gate, like apparently everyone else, she hurried thru what was seemed to be the rapidly growing gloom. Crickets, frogs, and few other unidentifiable scrapings were getting louder as she approached the old farm house....which was more or less completely covered in kudzu he could now see. A bit of chimney sticking out (he remembered the smell of hickory logs on late winter afternoons--the only heat for the whole house, other than the wood stove in the tiny primitive kitchen; couple of cats used to sleep under that stove. She remembered sitting on a tiny stool gazing thru the tiny mica window at the glow.) Can any of this be real? She looked up at a few early stars beginning to flicker thru the clouds. Sunlight still played on them, giving them a reddish tinge; a tiny sliver of moon was out simultaneously. For some reason she began remembering ghost stories from her childhood and he shook off a slight chill.
Privet hedge had grown up 10 feet high all around the front porch, mingling with the kudzu...where the hell had the kudzu come from? Never had been any on the farm that he could remember.... The whole scene began shifting, from external to internal and back again, getting into the pink 57 chevy, the old horse and buggy (fancy two-seated, black with red-stripping), the chickens roaming around the yard, like some fuckin' computer simulation--or Twilight Zone episode. The place where she slipped off the horse because daddy didn't cinch it tight enough; the attack of the giant rooster; all the barns, sheds...gone. She had thought about going inside but he couldn t bear it. The abrupt collapse of time was too much. All of a sudden the universe was entirely too malevolent, time an actual palpable <thing> sitting, hanging in the very air, in the gathering damp, in the goddamn stars that were now coming out entirely too rapidly, some ghoul entent on gathering HIM up in its damp tentacles, folks beginning to clamour for attention in his head, DEAD folks at that, just too much. She began backing up rapidly, stumbling over a fallen limb in what used to be the old sandy drive way (it had originally been U-shaped, with two gates; she had first learned to ride a bike in that sand). She turned and ran, around the gate, thru the grass, kcking up fireflies, round the bend, half sloshing, half jumping over the stream. Something big jumped into the water. Part way up the hill, she turned, shifted the notebook to the other hand, and breathing deeply, looked back over the decimated farmland, a blasted hell of redneck loggers, fires they had set, gotten out of hand...Ghosts--maybe they had killed all the ghosts--or at least driven them away. A dog barked in the distance as he turned and trotted up the hill, not quite so spooked now but still not very much at ease.
She felt somehow...denser inside than when she was a kid, like there was too much stuff packed in. Not necessarily good stuff or bad stuff or even particularly interesting stuff...just events and then the decay of those events in some sort of an inexorable progression of which she surely knew the end. Fuck. She never used to think like this. She KNEW she shouldn t have come back...this was worse than those pictures flipping thru her head at night. Wasn' t this what she had spent whole decades of her life trying to avoid? This kind of mournful, melancholic crap...
She picked up speed as he reached the top of the hill, hugging the laptop tightly to her chest, the dark closing in, time thickening, turning into some howling void, filled with crickets, deafening cicadas, like the 3 K background radiation of the universe, now a godforsaked screeching; even the stars seemed to have lost that timeless feeling for which he had always valued them, turning into ash heaps of radiation, harbingers of BAD infinity...22
To maintain together that which does not hold together, and the disparate itself, the same disparate, all of this can be thought (we will come back to this incessantly as well as to the spectrality of the specter) only in a dis-located time of the present, at a joining of a radically dis-jointed time, without certain conjunction. Not a time whose joinings are negated, broken, mistreated, dysfunctional, disadjusted, according to a DYS- of negative opposition and dialectical disjunction, but a time without CERTAIN joining or determinable conjunction. What is said here about time is also valid, consequently and by the same token, for history, even if the latter can consist in repairing, with effects of conjuncture (and that is the world), the temporal disjoining. *The time is out of joint*: time is DISARTICULATED, dislocated, dislodged, time is run down, on the run and run down, DERANGED, both out of order and mad. Time is off its hinges, time is off course, beside itself, disadjusted. Says Hamlet. Who thereby opened one of those breaches, often they are poetic and thinking peepholes, through which Shakespeare will have kept watch over the English language... p. 18 Jacque Derrida, Specters of Marx
		"...History as a closed loop with a twist: Mobius strip..."
  1. "...Hamlet's great formula: `The time is out of joint'. Time is out of joint, time is unhinged. The hinges are the axis around which the door turns. Cardo, in Latin, designates the subordination of time to the cardinal points through which the periodical movements that it measures pass. As long as time remains on its hinges, it is subordinate to movement: it is the measure of movement, interval or number. This was the view of ancient philosophy. But time out of joint signifies the reversal of movement-time relationship. It is now movement which is subordinate to time. Everything changes, including movement. We move from one labyrinth to another. The labyrinth is no longer a circle, or a spiral which would translate its complications, but a thread, a straight line, all the more mysterious for being simple, inexorable as Borges says, `the labyrinth which is composed of a single straight line. and which is indivisible, incessant.' Time is no longer related to the movement which it measures, but movement is related to the time which conditions it: this is the first great Kantian reversal in The Critique of Pure Reason."
    			Gilles eleuze, Kant's Critical Philosophy
  2. "Something wonderful is about to happen."
    				The entity known as Dave Bowman, as it
    				appears through the television in 
                                        2010: The Movie

  3. "The apocalypse is the way the world looks after the ego has disappeared."
    				Northrop Frye
  4. "We live, no doubt. in a civilization which sets strongly guarded barriers around our use of words, but, naturally enough, brings to life a number of ways to cheat the wardens. We are not sure where the invincible ghost of the Absolute is going to re-emerge from and how it will come back to life. It might loom up from quite unexpected corners, for instance from the razor-sharp minds of physicists and mathematicians..."
    				Leslek Kolakowski / Metaphysical Horror
  5. "Only a god can save us now."
    				Last interview with Martin Heidegger
  6. Some of my earliest memories have to do with sitting in a pew of a Baptist church in Mississippi. They were called "hard-shelled" Baptists, I guess what we would call fundamentalist today, except that 35 years ago they were all pretty much fundamentalists. The preacher ("ministers" were for the Methodists, "clergy" had something to do with those mysterious Presbyterians--I always used to think of that science fiction movie from the 50s, The Mysterians.) Baptists were kind of like amoebas I used to think, always splitting over doctrinal disputes, setting up in tents, blasting away at sins under a haze of 60 watt bulbs, moths, and the smell of sawdust scattered around the folding chairs to keep down the dust, as a ragged handful of raw-boned farmers and their families traipsed through the muggy Mississippi nights to be terrified of their own and their neighbors sins and the redemption to be found at the end of time, WHICH COULD BE ANY DAY NOW!! we were repeatedly warned. And besides, if it didn't happen in a wholesale way with THIS generation of vipers, you could be sure that YOU were gonna die and for sure your parents were on death's doorstep and hence only an eyeblink away from either Jesus or the Devil, and THENCE a long Sleep which would be but another blink of the eye whereupon, for those favored few, the resurrection would find then sitting at the left hand of God Almighty, away from the apocalyptic turmoil sure to be visited upon heathens, unbelievers, and Republicans. And of course revivals were those week long periods when the congregation brought in a hellfire and brimstone preacher from outside the community to give us all a good fright. Yea, for that week death and damnation hovered as omnipresent possibilities, the steely eyed, rhythmic cadence from the pulpit assuring of God's love (IF you accepted Jesus as your savior... REPENT!!) as a way of avoiding those all-consuming fires which were burning on all sides of the beleagured community but were nothing as unto those Almighty Fires which were to rage at the end of time, relegating the unfaithful and the backsliders to an unrecoverable limbo of eternal Waiting for a god who would never come.
    Revelations chpt 6:
    
    
    				 2.  And I saw, and behold a white horse: and he that
    
    				sat on him had a bow; and a crown was given unto him: and he
    				went forth conquering, and to conquer....
    				 4.  And there went out another horse that was red: 
    				and power was given to him that sat thereon to take peace 
    				from the earth, and that they should kill one another: and there 
    				was given unto him a great sword.
  7. And when he had opened the third seal, I heard the third beast say, come and see. And I beheld, and lo a black horse; and he that sat on him had a pair of balances in his hand....
  8. And I looked, and behold a pale was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth....
  9. And I beheld when he had opened the sixth seal, and, lo, there was a great earthquake; and the sun be- came black as sackcloth of hair and the moon became as blood;
  10. And the stars of heaven fell unto the earth, even as a fig tree casteth her untimely figs, when she is shaken of a mighty wind.
  11. And the heaven departed as a scroll when it is rolled together; and every mountain and island were moved out of their places.
  12. And the kings of the earth, and the great men, and the rich men, and the chief captains, and the mighty men, and every bondsman, and every free man, hid themselves in the dens and in the rocks of the mountains;
  13. And said to the mountains and rocks, Fall on us, and hide us from the face of him that sitteth on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb;
  14. For the great day of his wrath is come; and who shall be able to stand? 8. Collapse::FLOOD: The dissolution of former systems, an appalling clutter of debris lacking center, cohesiveness, a fall from those compact territories of desire and connectedness, but always INTO as well as AWAY FROM: currents functioning chiasmatically as well as rhizomatically, leading in all directions at once. Not into a black hole of nothingness but rather explosions of possiblities, including the most abject, the most forlorn, vectorization stripped away with the subsequent release of chiasmatic forces (well, they were always there, weren't they? but covered by the thinnest veneer of directionality, of identity--and what is identity but a direction, well chosen or not? and who is fortunate enough to choose such a thing?) It seems to choose us (both "us" as an aggregate assemblage and "one" as both representative of the ensemble and a singularity.) That is, a chiasmatic relationship as well, a jostling crowd/one, an impenetrable mass of collapsings/becomings. And when the collapsing singularities energies reach a certain threshold? Another vectorization sets in on another plane, sepsis turns to apocalypsis and, at least the notions of, anti-sepsis becomes the goal of apocalypsis itself, cleansing the wretched surface of the body (of the earth, of the body, of the sex) first flooding in a grand deluvial exhaustion of lacrymal possibilities of the Grandest Organ of all, the great tear ducts of Gaia forming, however, merely more pools of possibilities (Lightening/fire , yet to come). Gestating yet another round of sepsis/anti-, incubating (where? historically? virally carried through its singular members? Oh, the Church Triumphant YET AGAIN! but with a different name of course. Science we know thee well! SAVE US! as only a god can...but perhaps that is not what Heidegger meant.) But save us with fire NEXT time (this time?), wither Time itself, shrivel it on the vine, in fact destroy the vine, any possibility of return to biosis, that holding tank of sepsis, decay, that impossibility masquerading as life, result of the first biotic flooding of earth. Oh you puny sack of water, of lacrymosal yearning for your own FUCKING DISSOLUTION in oceans!! Flooding, flooding, that's all it ever wants, lost in that great abysmal chain of land-locked flesh, always thinking that it's bidding its time, ready to make the Big Leap onto land. You never got out of the goddam ocean, you fucker! Yeah, here's your collapse for you: breaking the damn, effluvial drenching so that it comes back thrice fold. Flood it, grow it, flood it, grow it--irrigate the old vaginal wall, plant your corn. Yes, it's a collapse, a perennial collapse, happening continuously, in a bedroom nearest you. But what does it have to do with the Fire?..............................
    9. It might be helpful to delineate some the features which have characterized apocalypsis, at least in its Judeo-Christian formation which is certainly the most imbricated with western civilization and its technological strut work:
    1. The word "apocalypse" itself is from the Greek and means an `unveiling', or `uncovering' of a secret. More importantly, the revealing of The Secret and the Secret of God and not gods, a singular, unified monological Secret and not multiple, dispersed secrets forever and continuously being opened, revealed, etc. (The most public of secrets is sexuality, For some explorations of such bodily "unveiling" as it subtends - or prehenses - the "apocalyptic moment", see Of An Apocalyptic Tone Recently Adopted In Philosophy, Jacques Derrida.) Although the most popular notion of this unveiling is as an all-at-once blow, Northrop Frye maintains that the concept is more subtle: "We are greatly oversimplifying the vision [of a new heaven and earth.rc], however, if we think of it simply as what the author thought was soon going to happen, as a firework show that would be put on for the benefit of the faithful, starting perhaps next Tuesday. For him all these incredible wonders are the inner meaning or, more accurately, the inner form of everything that is happening now. Man creates what he calls history as a screen to conceal the workings of the apocalypse from himself....What is symbolized as the destruction of the order of nature is the destruction of the the way of seeing that order that keeps man confined to the world of time and history as we know them. This destruction is what the Scripture is intended to achieve." For Frye, the Scriptures apocalyptic rhetoric serves as a pry bar to lift the lid on things-as-they-are and to reveal that the real mystery resides in why we cannot continually see through to the real struggles of life rather than blinded by "the power of Nero", say, reading the Book of Revelations almost as a Zen fable of enlightment, open at every minute of time for personal collapse/rebirth, "like a thief in the night".
      And so the Bible must ride the borders of the Real, cutting off escape through reference to the Real by subsuming the Real into itself--there is no escape from the Biblical prophecies (says the Bible) because the Scripture encompasses all that is, that CAN be, eradicating, de-toxifying all those multiplicities and Others whether gods, goddesses, ghosts or goblins. The history of the Judeo-Christian tradition, including all the struts which it has made possible and which have dissembled their disavowal and allegiance to such (for example: theory and technology to name two; there are exceptions only if we consider the question from a non-structural angle. But mostly the onto-theological pact has been signed, sealed and delivered always already as it were.) Assume that in some sense both a transcendental and an immanentist approach to apocalypsis are possible (and given the prophetic emphasis on collapse of reference as the final air-tight seal), then it is possible to see the sublime and the uncanny in that Single Event/collapse (although the battle is always on, for Churches of whatever stripe, with the uncanny (unheimlich), a continual oscillatory struggle for the borderlands, which pop up all over: Jesus versus Casper, the Friendly Ghost!) Yes, multiple unveilings are on God's shit list as Heidegger, ventriloquized by Hans Jonas, paganistically (and surreptitiously) pointed out: "My theological friends, my Christian friends--don't you see what you are dealing with? Don't you sense, if not see, the profoundly pagan character of Heidegger's thought? Rightly pagan, insofar as it is philosophy, though not every philosophy must be so devoid of objective norms... " (Jonas, 148) Jonas goes on to decry a Heideggerean theology as a wolf in sheep's clothing, using the apparatus of transcendental Christianity but detouring it from an Absolute Sublime to what threatens a Daemonic Uncanniness at every turn. Heidegger's notion of a Primal Thinking unleashes the immanentist gates for permanent revelation, apt to happen anywhere because not enthralled to an Absolute Transcendental Other (the Big Bang of the Final slamming shut of judgement's Big Book of Law at the end of history); and as a corollary, the resulting primacy of non-objective speech, "pneumatic theology", "glossolaly", or poesis, and presumably the intrusion of these modes into the intimate workings of the culture. Collapse would then be prefigured, frighteningly for Jonas, in such a scheme as a common occurence, one at the beck and call of man--like the collapse of distance in picking up a phone perhaps.)
    2. The Big Apocalypse (to distinguish it from the always already everywhere `little apocalypse' of technological collapse--not that it has escaped heavy onto-theological investments, which are only recently beginning to pay off in the form of a mediatized `stitching closed' of histories, as Jean Baudrillard has been pointing out) comes as the fulfillment of a promise, of law returning to Law and of Law disappearing, falling away (the chiasmatic morphing of Christ and Marx here): "After the `Last Judgement.' the law loses its last hold on us, which is the hold of the legal vision that ends there." (Frye, 137) The final collapse (Frye divides it into a "panoramic apocalypse" of "staggering marvels placed in a near future and just before the end of time" and a "participating apocalypse" or a rebirth into a new universe, as one is destroyed and closes and another opens up) is a prelude, the final consummation of the Law which is simultaneously a conflagration, and a consumption, one which seeks to have no remainder, no dark bolus, no slender slivers of cinders suitable for etching memoirs, beginning of history again, by survivors. The apocalyptic tradition does not WANT that but that is precisely what it gets every time prophecy fails which is every time (technology knows differently: it is prophecy's secret, stuttered success, the skipping over of the emergency which is history, and the secretive [in full view, aka purloined letters] by fulfillment of the Law. The failure of Prophecy and the success of Technology: inextricably linked, inculcating collapse/apocalypsis into the very eidos of techné. That final juridical adjudication (which is announced with the stroke of a pen) signals the end of the human universe and its replacement by the Doll Universe.
  15. "The substitution of rules for law in modern times seems an attempt not only to demystify power's link to prohibition, but also to free thought from the One by proposing, to everyday human affairs, the multiplicity of undetermined possibilities created by technologies. But there has always been an ambiguity in what goes by the name of law: in its sacred, sovereign guise, it claims to derive from nature; it annexes to itself the noble prestige of the blood; it is not power but omnipotence. There is nothing but the law; whatever it is exerted against, is simply nothing: not humanity, but only myths, monsters, fascinations. Judaic law is not sacred, but holy. In place of nature--which it does not invest with the magic of sin--it puts relations, choices, mandates: that is to say, a language of obligations. In place of the ethnic, it puts the ethical. Rites are religious, but they do not transform the everyday into religious affectivity; they seek, rather, to lighten the time that has no history by knitting it together through practices, services--by forming a meticulous network of consents in the glad daylight of historical memories and anticipations"
    			(The Writing of the Disaster, Maurice Blanchot, p.144)
  16. "Law--prosaic laws--free us, perhaps, from the Law by substituting for the invisible majesty of time the various constraints of space. Similarly, rules suppress, in the term `law,' what power--ever primary--evokes. Rules also suppress the rights which go along with the notion of law, and establish the reign of pure procedure which--a manifestation of technical competence, of sheer knowledge--invests everything, controls everything, submits every gesture to its administration, so that there is no longer any possibility of liberation, for one can no longer speak of oppression."
    			(The Writing of the Disaster, Maurice Blanchot,p.144)
  17. Collapse:FIRE: Cataclysmic consumption by fiery rain, from without, no remainder, fervently held wish for no cinders, no leftovers for indictment, creating fertile ground for another round: "Our entire world is the cinder of innumerable living beings; and what is living is so little in relation to the whole, it must be that , once already, everything was transformed into life and it will continue to be so." (F. Nietzsche) Spoken like a true pagan...but not the eschatological fire of the End, of the Scriptures, but rather the pale fire rising from bios. Maybe there is no other -- but that is not the scourging which the Bible attempts to set flaming: no cinders (carbon stains, traces of biotic activity, pencil precursor sketching its own demise) left to etch faint markings, directions to those travelers who have lost their way in the material fire storms; no, at least it wishes for none of that because it wishes to totally eradicate memory traces, writings, books, in favor of complete enclosure by the Book scrubbed clean by divine flames--BUT flames from without, clearly delivered by the Hand of God, wrathful devastation from the sky, bollides and fiery omens. Better yet : collision with the sun. Final eradication of daemonic internal travelers (para-sites), the final solution of the outside: eviscerated, burned...
    				Cinder is only a word.  But what is a word for consuming
                    itself all the way to its support (the tape-recorded voice or
                    strip of paper, self-destruction of the impossible emission
                    once the order is given), to the point of assimilating it
                    without apparent remainder.?
    						Cinders, Jacques Derrida, p.73
  18. The necessity, for the sublimed Other to appear/to be appeased, of burnt sacrifices: Greeks conducting smoke to the gods, Christians inflaming the Holy Ghost, Nazis constructing smokestacks in search of sublime apocalyptic Purity. Sacrificial consumption: the bottleneck at the Mobiated twist pinching off to perversity, the sloughing off of one side of the chiasmatic stem--but always with a penalty paid (sacrifice) that leaves a rem(a)inder, a slagheap of guilty, reanimated cinders writing themselves--again! always again!--into existence, rising ghosts (geist) to refill, crawl up the non-demolished strutwork. The quest for the Fire Next Time, yes, the quest for the historical movement without rem(a)inder, without the dragging, limping foot marking the blackened, burnt, bloody stump tracing passage. Goodbye Animal! You are done for in me! I have sacrificed you! (And, if necessary, will sacrifice you, and you, and...If deconstruction is anything, it is this examination of the sacrificial moment as it makes its way, and is morphed along the way--one must be careful of what one thinks one sees--"through" history, which is simultaneously history's construction-of-itself [no plural]. And that is also the sublime, apocalyptic moment. No wonder the Bomb makes us shiver with a delicious fright.
  19. c. Authors of the apocalypse, would-be prophets all, tend toward pseudonymic devices (which are simultaneously cryptonymic, waiting -- `apocalyptically' -- for emergence, the re-name and the secret name folded together, initially), re-naming strategies which facilitate the emergence of new dimensions, vistas, abandoning the genealogical in toto as a "false memory syndrome" with the Real yet (always yet) to come, a coming hastened by a new `christening'. The destiny and fate conferred by the merely biotic (the family name) are sloughed off through re-naming, Cratylean rigid designation repudiated, melted down--and then believed in again! (Jacob taking up the name "Israel" which is taken to mean "he who sees God".) Numerological symbolism cannot be far behind at this point. All points on the compass of the Real are taken to point to the same magnetic north, all events become magnetized, quivering arrows pointing outside the purview of genealogical restraints of the traditions of the species, a new Adamic dispensation is allowed the re-named prophet. (A prophet apparently always being a transducer: having "heard" the word of God, he transforms it into a "seeing", a vision. This is one of the primary mechanisms of transformation/transition for the JudeoChristian tradition of transformative apocalypse, one of the pistons in the engine of Western industrial, scientific culture.) Perhaps an attempt to escape fate by motivating character for: "...where there is character there will, with certainty, not be fate, and in the area of fate character will not be found." (W. Benjamin/Fate and Character) Character is always subject to a re-naming, refiguring; fate, never. Fate is always, already, always `before' and always `after'. Character is always yet to (fully) be, waiting.
  20. In an apocalyptic culture (which Western culture has been since its inception and continues to be, the two being virtually co-terminous) re-naming becomes the paramount "fact" of existence, the attempt to move the baseline of operation of the species ever further from its genealogical specifications, from a series' `fated' status. The so-called "linguistic turn," as the overt realization of this phenomena, is not only in the philosophical sphere, using Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Wittgenstein as metonymic constructs for that `advance', but is the most visible aspect of late-modernism, or post-modernism. It is only with the fairly recent emergence of powerful cultural devices for re-enscription (or re-naming and which amounts to a genealogical severing: of fate from character, of past from future, of content from context, sex from reproduction, etc.) based on a combination of methodological strategies developed in the early 20th century which sought to bring into bold relief various genealogical aspects of human species life, whether micrological (Freud), macrological (Marx) or even ontological (Heidegger), with technical devices of representation (film, television, computer). The "event" : although in terms of the technical media, the event is of the nature of "will be" rather than "there is". The point could be made that the psychological accouterment of techné for humans is expectancy, "waiting for...", why Beckett is the Head Tech Writer for the Western world's Manual of Operation.
  21. "...If Kant denounces those who proclaim that philsophy is at an end for two thousand years, he has himself, in marking a limit, indeed the end of a certain type of metaphysics, freed another wave of eschatological discourses in philosophy. His progressivism, his belief in the future of a certain philosophy, indeed of another metaphysics, is not contradictory to this proclamation of ends and of the end. [...] from then on and with multiple and profound differences, indeed mutations, being taken into account, the West has been dominated by a powerful program that was also an untransgressible contract among discourse of the end. The themes of history's end and of philosophy's death represent only the most comprehensive, massive and assembled forms of this. [There are many differences but] haven't all the differences taken the form of a going-one-better in eschatological evidence, each newcomer, more lucid than the other, more vigilant and more prodigal too than the other, coming to add more to it: I tell you this in truth; this is not only the end of this here but also and first of that there, the end of history, the end of the class struggle, the end of philosophy, the death of God, the end of religions, the end of Christianity and morals (that, that was the most serious naiveté), the end of the subject, the end of man, the end of the West, the end of Oedipus, the end of the earth, Apocalypse Now, I tell you, in the cataclysm, the fire, the blood, the fundamental earthquake, the napalm descending from the sky by helicopters, like prostitutes, the nuclear thumder and the great whoring, also the end of literature, the end of painting, art as a thing of the past, the end of psychoanalysis, the end of the university, the end of phallocentrism and phallogocentrism, and I don't know what else?" (Of An Apocalyptic Tone Recently adopted in Philosophy. Jacques Derrida, trans. John P. Leavey in Semeia 23)
  22. LEAK: Pressure differentials, caused by. Formerly impassable barrier becomes permeable at weakest points, flow-behaviour resulting. 1. "to let a fluid substance out or in accidently; 2. "to enter or escape accidently from an object or container. 3. "to become known little by little by accident , carelessness, or treachery; as, the truth leaked out." (Or leaked in?) Variants: osmosis--selective "leaks' or transmission through a membrane; used for separating out molecular materials, analysis. Hemmorhage: violent bleeding, bursting from the vessel. Minimum conditions include: at least two heterogeneous, contiguous regions of varying entropic stabilities separated by a neutral barrier, itself subject to structural instabilities either inherent to the material of which it is constructed, or due to pressure gradients on either side, usually a combination, a situational or contextual failure.
  23. d. In that liminal condition, that pnumbral advance between regions, lie chaos-monsters, combinatory figures prefiguring the new and destroying the old, always threatening to escape the liminal threshold, voiding the material, genealogical constraints of species identity--both a threat and a promise. (The osmotic force no longer derives from heterogeneous regions but from the liminal state itself, a state constantly being expanded and reinforced through techne; technique IS that boundary state.) In this new order (which is always old, parasitic, viral, biding its time) Fire and Flood no longer suffice as descriptors of threat/promise, proffering all-at-once cleansing/gestation/destruction, always fronm the outside. The hinge itself is now guarantor of apocalypsis, a perpetual binge state, simultaneously in collapse and reconstruction, propelled by liminality. No longer a pass-through, the place of chaos-monsters becomes the staging ground, the liminal technical porosity itself the ontological weave superceding the ontic on either side; or rather the ontic itself becomes "infected" with the sieve-like character of the (formerly prophylactic) partition. All dualities now part and multiply, becoming yet further uncanny perforations, driven by faster and more intimate communication among regions.
  24. STAIN: embalming, emulation, epidemiology, contamination saturation of surounding regions, effecting a change usually thought counter to the "interests" (betraying a certain `moral' vector which one aspect of `stain' definitely has: "a stained soul') of the previous surface or figuration. contamination: source-point spread post-mortem rigor (to do Kant proud) through suffusion from injector--single point entry--spreading throughout the organism: replace "stain" of death ("deathly pallor") with "healthy glow" of emulation of life. And `staining' also raises the grain, by differential absorption, or one aspect of surface figuration from the surrounding area, giving `relief', showing patterns hitherto hidden.
  25. "Cultural technologies could be attributed to Man only as long as they were marked off off along the abscissa of biological time, whereas the time of the apparatus liquates Man. Given the apparatus, Man in his unity decomposes, on the one hand, into illusions dangled in front of him by conscious abilities and faculties and, on the other hand, into unconscious automatisms..."
    			Discourse Networks 1800/1900, Friedrich Kittler.
    				21.unheimlich< >techné
    				(the [art]ificial)    
                                        
    				catastrophe(from Lacoue-Labarth)
  26. Collapse through evacuation/renovation through ghosts (geist), revenants (those who come back after a long absence
  27. Catastrophe theory: the collapse of time into space or rather: the exploration of the hinge at which temporal bends into the spatial: the return of movement/spatiality (after Kant)? The drop off the cusp (and no longer the drop-off (up) of the Generalized Sublime, rather the Particularized Uncanny, the McKennaean Singularity): basic spawning ground of the un-homed, the un-hinged. The attempt to drop from Law to rule, the corraling of the uncanny by Cartesian drop-offs, no longer subject to a Great Beyond (but perhaps subject to Kittler's Great Lalula): "I call disaster that which does not have the ultimate for a limit: it bears the ultimate away in the disaster." (M. Blanchot, The Writing of the Disaster, p.28) Another name for that "disaster" is radical multiplicity; another name: techné.
  28. On a metaphysical level, the term used for such a catastrophe (a disaster of ontological proportions, reaching FROM the epistemological INTO the ontological and vice versa, in indeterminable relationship: a relationship which the structuralist/poststructuralist controversy mimics and relays) is "the fall". In the history of metaphysics, the fall is *into* (the material world, the burden of flesh, the density of earth) and *away from* (divine grace, pure light, pure being, ousia, etc.) Apocalypsis reverses those relationships, now collapsing the material world onto itself, releasing embedded history, law, and spirit into the fulfillment of their capitalized equivalents (Spirit, Law, History--economic capital, then, through technique, fulfills the requirements for their merging [the so-call Hegelian *end of history*) which then dissolve one into the other, the Fall *down* then becomes pure ascension. This chiasmos, and its fractilized variants, informs almost the whole of Western cultural and intellectual production. Older forms were largely unthought, simply inhabited; the sublime forms (transcendental) of the 19th century giving rise to the uncanny (immanentist) forms of the late 20th, leading to the evacuated (technological) forms of the 21st century (each imbricated with the other from the very beginning). The fall(s) become the coded remnant of the jagged, sutured link with technology (and there are sutures that allow movement--joints, tectonic plates--and that are immovable--teeth to jaw, bones of skull.) and of course sewn-together flesh/cobbled-together bone which allow a fusing/growth through the suture and subsequent scar tissue, marking the place, tracing the suture, sous rature in flesh, X-ed out, yet remaining (and the signs remaining not because anything has been excised but because something has been join(t)ed: stainless steel riven through the bone: a gambit (:*to sacrifice or gamble one thing for another*) to generate movement. Steel through bone: schrapnel or prosthesis-- the war machine moves one way or the other but move it does: sutured to consciousness and then consciousness sutured to the war machine and then... iterations eliding the flesh with each jointed repetition, moving beyond the strip, flesh reveiled/reviled, frayed, metal joint showing through, hastening evacuation steps for emergencies. (Just what IS the fate of the dialectic? Mobius strip stripped?)

Monday, April 10, 2017

working within the Light, Make It UP!

konx (om pax)
Fehta Murghana
(we are grateful to the estate of Ms. Murghana for allowing us to use this material. I had asked her to prepare some liner notes awhile before her demise and then forgot about it. As an Islamic folklorist, last work was the concept of djinn in al-Andalus.

40 Or like darkness on a deep sea, there covers it a wave above
which is a wave, above which is a cloud, -- darknesses one above the
other, --when one puts out his hand he can scarcely see it; for he to
whom God has given no light, he has no light.

Koran
sura 24 v. 40)
Aaaah! Now we begin to see where the name ‘Konx’ comes from! (Often phonetically transliterated into ‘knox’, it is sometimes in fact found that way in the ancient literature.) We were originally assured that ‘konx’ (also called ‘conk’) was a slippage for a ‘konk’ or a processed hair style of hep cats in the african american community in the 1940’s and 50’s which flattened the curls, laying the hair tight against the skull. As a web site has it: “But conks, just like James Brown himself, were really beyond the law. What they denoted was aesthetic certitude - plus a spirit of true improvisation.”

Also undoubtedly to ‘konk out’ means to go unconscious, for your head to stop working....perhaps at least a partial prerequisite in some sense for improvisation in that one has to move through the material in an unpre-media-tated manner. Epiphanies may visit those who are in some sense prepared but it is to the unknowing that the most impact is felt. After all, light is most forceful to those who are suddenly deprived of the dark.

Now we come to find that the term is associated with both the Italian composer Giancinto Scelsi and occultist Aleister Crowley though the use of the phrase ‘konk om pax’. (1). Scelsi wrote a large orchestra piece in the mid-sixties called ‘Konk-om-pax’ but get this: his main method of composition was in fact improvisation which he then had someone else notate.

And of course there is the slim obscure book on the kabala by Crowley written in 1907 called ‘Konx Om Pax’. A selection: “till Konx om Pax replace Reading without Tears in every Infant School” and “It is one of the most suggestive definitions of KONX [....] that it transcends all the possible pairs of opposites.”

Perhaps good guidelines for certain improvisors.

But then what does ‘Konx om pax’ mean? it literally means ‘Light In Extension,’ a mystical precept coming from ancient Egypt. As we can see in the document below, the phrase itself seems to be a corrupt improvised fragment descending from ancient sources. The phrase seems to imply an embodiment of light, or , as it has been metaphorized through the European Enlightment, the Truth as it has been given an autonomized form (‘in entension.’ i.e., outside the etherialized provinces of whatever heavens or planes or dimensions that Truth is supposed to emanate from.) Certainly, as a species whose main organ and register of ‘truth’ is the optic this has great import but we might also ask if there can be an equivalent for the sonic, since in conditions of darkness (whether ontological, ethical, or cultural) sound would seem to take on an added significance. For example, language becomes of even greater import when manipulations of ‘light in extension’ (via the emerging kybernetic world) create conditions of great instabity and uncertainty.

At any rate, there is an uncanny sense of a mechanicalization here, of the making of an optical engine, when light becomes autonomous; there is an inevitability concerning the process (although only time can tell of the necessity of its occurrence; that is, Truth -- as Light -- walking the land by itself, unencumbered by hermeneusis.)

There is an immediacy implied in the formulation which more than suggests the improvisational, but that inhabits the improvised and makes it ‘walk’ and which points to a now-occulted entry point for the ability to ‘walk’ (one thinks of the cabalistic concept of the golem here which is animated by the hebrew words for truth inscribed on its ... head.

Simultaneously with this concept of the improvised as an unencumbered movement of ‘truth,’ it is undermined and turned into a mechanical puppet, doll, or automaton which is still centrally coordinated since truth must in some sense refer to axial arrangements, symmetries, and coordinations from outside the immediacy of movement, otherwise chaotic randomness governs. (We note that this is in fact what complexity theory and certain aspects of quantum mechanics imply and that in fact this ‘coordination of truth’ or ‘light in extension’ or ‘konx om pax’ can be mathematized, hypothesized, and perhaps in some sense ‘made mechanical’ but that intuitive human understanding will never grasp it, and that in fact the only relationship to it can be the improvised, as some post modern variation of Pascal’s wager or the old saying that ‘no matter where you go, there you are.’)

The feeling of ‘being there’ (whilst simulaneously and necessarily being ‘absented’) is entirely the province of the improvisational and all its complications, failures and liabilities. (2) This music you hold in your hand (and will shortly put ‘in extension’) fuses all these characteristics in a sometimes overpowering mix and makes us think that, after all this, Light can indeed walk.
notes
1. “The words ‘Khabs am Pekht, which accompany the Golden Dawn ritual knocks, ‘seal the image of the light.’ and were first given by the 17th century writer Meursius (according to David Godwin on Pg. 71 his wonderful work, “Light in Extension”). The document Z1 says, ‘their significance implies, by various Qabalistic methods of analysis, as well as by a certain reading of the Coptic and Egyptian hieroglyphics, Light in Extension, or may light be extended in abundance upon you. Konx om Pax is the corrupted pronunciation of this, put here to link it with its right origin.’ Another translation is ‘Light rushing out in one ray.’

Recent investigation, with the assistance of the British Museum, has revealed that the most probable Egyptian origin for this phrase is hbs m pht, pronounced khebs m pekht. The word khebs actually means star or lamp rather than light, and the word pekht is a noun from the verb pekh, meaning to reach or attain. The museum thought that extension was a possible but unlikely translation.

Thus, the most accurate translation of “Khabs am Pekht” is rendered as the attainment of the star, a phrase of particular and peculiar significance. The corruption Konx om Pax is, at least according to the museum, “a complete mystery, being neither Greek nor Coptic nor indeed a rendering of the hieroglyphics”. As the Fellowship of Isis documents note, “initiates [of the Elusian Mysteries] were dismissed with two barbarous words, Konx Ompax, of which perhaps the Hierophants themselves did not comprehend the import they had been introduced by the first Egyptian mysteries. To us the words in question appear to be Syriac, and signify, be vigilant, be innocent.” Another offered version is light is strength.

2. ("The three principles constituting allegorical poiesis are parallel with, while differing fundamentally from, the triad of matter, negation, and form: monumentality, violence, and improvisation."
[....]
"The third principle, improvisation, has obvious relevance to the example of Homeric diction, as it does to the combinative dexterity of spontaneous composition in music. Far from being a deviation from the norm in the arts of the West these practices disclose what is essential to making. In even the most rigorously classical composition order is achieved by working with chance. A structure is developed gradually out of the chaotic interactions between the mind of the artist and the materials at hand, that is, the fragments of previous works. At the most fundamental level, poiesis is a schematizing of fragments of the previously made. Through a complex process of struggle among layered revisions, these fall into a pattern that cannot be foreseen but only revealed as it emerges in time."

"The concept of improvisation appears in Aristotle’s Poetics, where it denotes the unskilled, haphazard manner of working which was gradually displaced by the poets as they developed their art. At the beginning of Western aesthetics the technological theory of making is founded on the concept of improvisation as amateurish, ignorant. The verb ‘to improvise’ is autoschediazein, implying the self-development of an external form, a schema, as one proceeds, rather than working with a preexisting idea according to a preexisting rule. While the word was generally used in a perjorative sense, it has a positive application in complex systems that change over time, compelling one to rely on instinctive impulse rather than on rules. In Thucydides and Xenophon improvisation is associated with political and military genius, with a sure sense of timing and of touch, nourished by experience, empathy, and talent. These are of course the very qualities we associate also with lasting achievement in the arts. Now allegory is unusual among the older literary genres in being a more openly improvisatory form. It therefore provides us with an occasion to reflect on the wider significance of the two models of artistic production being considered here: technological making, the imposition of form on indifferent substance, and schematic, or improvisational, making."
Allegory and Violence
Gordon Teskey 163-165)